Data · U.S. EIA · LBNL · ERCOT

Mapping the U.S. data-center buildout over the power grid

Where AI infrastructure is landing — and the grid bottlenecks standing in the way. Built entirely from public data.

A Gridlas analysis · maps rendered with QGIS + matplotlib · figures current as of late 2025

The bottleneck for AI isn't chips — it's electricity, and the years-long wait to connect to the grid. I wanted to see that collision spatially, so I pulled public datasets — EIA for power plants and transmission lines, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's "Queued Up" for interconnection queues, and ERCOT's load reports — and rendered them into maps. Here's what stood out.

1. Data centers are bending a flat demand curve

For two decades U.S. electricity demand was essentially flat — efficiency offset growth. AI broke that. Data centers consumed 4.4% of U.S. electricity in 2023, a share LBNL projects will reach 6.7%–12% by 2028. The load is also concentrated: it lands on specific grids, around the clock, faster than utilities have ever had to respond.

Data center share of U.S. electricity, 2023 vs 2028
Data-center share of U.S. electricity. Source: LBNL (2024).

2. The map is concentrating

Plotting every major cluster, one market dwarfs the rest: Northern Virginia, at roughly 4,040 MW, is about 3.5× every secondary U.S. market combined. Dallas–Fort Worth and Atlanta have each crossed a gigawatt; Phoenix and central Ohio are climbing fast.

Map of major U.S. data-center clusters over the power grid
Major U.S. data-center clusters, sized by operating capacity. Cluster locations approximate (public CBRE/JLL, late 2025).
Top U.S. data-center markets by capacity
Top markets by operating capacity. Source: CBRE / JLL (H2 2025).

3. The real bottleneck: the interconnection queue

No market shows the strain like Texas. ERCOT's large-load interconnection queue went from 63 GW at the end of 2024 to ~226 GW by November 2025 — roughly a 4× jump in a year, with about 77% of it data centers aiming to connect by 2030.

ERCOT large-load queue growth
ERCOT large-load interconnection queue. Source: ERCOT / Latitude Media (Nov 2025).

But a queue is a wish list, not a build plan. Of that 226 GW, only about 1.8% is actually operational and drawing power — more than half hasn't even submitted enough information to begin review.

Queued versus operational capacity in ERCOT
Queued ≠ built. Source: ERCOT / Latitude Media (Nov 2025).

Why so little gets through? The wait. Nationally, the median time from interconnection request to commercial operation has more than doubled — from under two years in the 2000s to about 4.5 years for projects reaching operation in 2024.

Interconnection wait times over time
Median interconnection duration. Source: LBNL "Queued Up" (2025).
Compute scales in months. Power scales in years. That mismatch is the whole story.

4. Supply is everywhere; demand isn't

Layering ~2,459 utility-scale power plants (≥100 MW, ~1,089 GW) under the demand picture makes the mismatch clear: generation blankets the country, but data-center load concentrates onto a handful of already-stressed grids. The problem isn't total capacity — it's location and timing.

Generation versus demand map
EIA power plants (colored by fuel) over data-center load by state. Source: U.S. EIA (public domain); clusters approximate.

Methodology & sources

Tools: maps and charts rendered with QGIS and Python (matplotlib) from raw public datasets. No proprietary data.

Sources:

Caveat: data-center cluster locations and capacities are approximate, compiled from public market reports. Generation/transmission/queue figures are from the government/lab sources above. Current as of late 2025.

I compiled the full version — five regional deep-dives, a 12-month outlook, and the underlying dataset (CSV/GeoJSON) — into a report. If you want the maps in high-res, the data, or just to talk methodology, it's all over here. You can also browse the regional breakdowns by state. Feedback and corrections welcome.

Gridlas · independent & unaffiliated · built from public data.